FAQ 1 - WHY DID I GET NOTICE?
FAQ 2 - WHAT IS THIS LAWSUIT ABOUT?
FAQ 3 - WHAT DOES THE SETTLEMENT PROVIDE?
FAQ 4 - WHY IS THERE A SETTLEMENT?
FAQ 5 - WHO IS IN THE SETTLEMENT CLASS?
FAQ 6 - WHAT ARE MY OPTIONS?
FAQ 7 - WHAT RIGHTS AM I GIVING UP IN THIS SETTLEMENT?
FAQ 8 - WHEN WILL I BE PAID?
FAQ 9 - WHEN WILL THE COURT RULE ON THE SETTLEMENT?
FAQ 10 - WHO REPRESENTS THE CLASS?
FAQ 11 - WHERE CAN I GET ADDITIONAL INFORMATION?
This is a court-authorized notice of a proposed settlement in a class action lawsuit, James Nosal v. Rich Products Corporation, Case No. 1:20-cv-04972, pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. The Settlement would resolve a lawsuit brought on behalf of a person who alleges that Rich Products Corporation (“Defendant” or “Rich Products”) workers provided their biometric identifiers and/or biometric information for authentication and timekeeping purposes without first providing them with legally-required written disclosures and obtaining written consent. Rich Products contests these claims and denies that it violated the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act. If you received the Notice, you have been identified as a member of the Settlement Class. The Court has granted preliminary approval of the Settlement Agreement and has conditionally certified the Settlement Class for purposes of settlement. The Notice explains the nature of the class action lawsuit, the terms of the Settlement, and the legal rights and obligations of the Settlement Class Members. Please read the instructions and explanations below so that you can better understand your rights.
Back To Top
The Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (“BIPA”), 740 ILCS 14/1, et seq., prohibits private companies from collecting, capturing, purchasing, receiving through trade, otherwise obtaining, storing, selling, leasing, trading, otherwise profiting from, transferring, disclosing, redisclosing, disseminating, and/or using biometric identifiers and/or biometric information, such as fingerprints of an individual, without first providing such individual with certain written disclosures and obtaining their written consent. This lawsuit alleges Rich Products violated BIPA by requiring workers to have their fingerprints scanned for authentication and timekeeping purposes without first providing written disclosures or obtaining written consent. Rich Products denies these allegations, denies violations of any law, and denies all liability for the claims raised in the lawsuit. Additional information can be obtained about the lawsuit by visiting the Documents section of this website.
Back To Top
Cash Payments. The Settlement provides that each Settlement Class Member is entitled to a gross payment of $975.00, which the parties estimate will result in a check for approximately $576.00 after applicable deductions set forth below.
Rich Products has agreed to create a Settlement Fund in the amount of $546,975.00 for the Settlement Class (561 x $975). If at any time before final approval it is determined that the class size exceeds 561 individuals, the Settlement Fund shall equal $975 per Class Member. If the Court grants final approval of the settlement, all Settlement Class Members will receive a payment out of the Settlement Fund, less deductions for all Court-approved settlement administration costs, attorneys’ fees and costs, and an incentive award to the Class Representative. Specifically, the attorneys who brought this lawsuit (listed below) will ask the Court to award them attorneys’ fees of up to 37.5% of the Settlement Fund, or $205,115.63, plus reasonable costs for the time, expense, and effort expended in investigating the facts, litigating the case, and negotiating the Settlement. The Class Representative also will petition the Court for a payment of $7,500.00 for his time, effort, and service in this matter. The Settlement Administrator will issue a check to each Settlement Class Member following final approval of the Settlement. All checks issued to Settlement Class Members will expire and become void 150 days after they are issued. If there is any amount remaining after the single distribution of checks, providing a 150-day check cashing period, 50% of such amounts will be transferred to a mutually agreeable cy pres that is approved by the Court and 50% will be returned to Rich Products. Should the Court require a second round of pro rata distribution to those Settlement Class Members who participated in the settlement by cashing their initial check or reject the 50% to be returned to Rich Products, the settlement will not be impacted.
Back To Top
To resolve this matter without the further expense, delay, and uncertainties of litigation, the Parties have reached a settlement that resolves all claims against Rich Products. The Settlement requires Defendant to pay money to the Settlement Class, as well as pay settlement administration expenses, attorneys’ fees and costs to Class Counsel, and an incentive award to the Class Representative, if approved by the Court. The Settlement is not an admission of wrongdoing by Defendant and does not imply that there has been, or would be, any finding that Defendant violated the law. Defendant denies that it violated BIPA and denies all liability, wrongdoing, or legal violations of any kind related to the claims and contentions asserted in this lawsuit.
Back To Top
You are a member of the Settlement Class if you worked or are currently working at and/or for Rich Products in the State of Illinois and purportedly had your Biometric Identifier(s) and/or Biometric Information collected, captured, otherwise obtained, used, received, converted, maintained, stored, shared, disseminated, or disclosed by Rich Products without first obtaining your written consent from June 18, 2013, through April 17, 2024.
Back To Top
Back To Top
Unless you exclude yourself from this Settlement, you will be considered a member of the Settlement Class, which means you give up any rights you currently have to sue Rich Products and the Released Parties (as that term is defined in the Settlement Agreement) under BIPA. Giving up your legal claims is called a release. The precise terms of the release are in the Settlement Agreement, which is available here, or may be requested from Class Counsel, the attorneys identified below who represent the Settlement Class. Unless you formally exclude yourself from this Settlement, you will release your claims.
Back To Top
The Parties cannot predict exactly when (or whether) the Court will give final approval to the Settlement, so please be patient. However, if the Court finally approves the Settlement, checks will go out as soon as possible after the court order becomes final. If there is an appeal of the Settlement, payment may be delayed.
Back To Top
The Court has already given preliminary approval to the Settlement. A final hearing on the Settlement, called a Final Approval Hearing, will be held on September 5, 2024 at 1:30 p.m. in Room 2125 of the Everett McKinley Dirksen United States Courthouse. The Court may reschedule the Final Approval Hearing at its discretion and without notifying Settlement Class Members. At the Final Approval Hearing, the Court will consider whether to make final the certification of the Class for settlement purposes, hear any proper objections and arguments to the Settlement, as well as any requests for an award of attorneys’ fees, costs, expenses, and an incentive award to the Class Representative.
If the Settlement is given final approval, the Settlement Agreement’s terms will take effect and the lawsuit will be dismissed on the merits. Both sides have agreed to the Settlement in order to achieve certain resolution to the lawsuit, in a manner that provides specific and valuable benefits to the members of the Settlement Class.
If the Court does not approve the Settlement, if it approves the Settlement and the approval is reversed on appeal, or if the Settlement does not become final for some other reason, you will not be paid at this time and Settlement Class Members will receive no benefits from the Settlement. Plaintiff, Defendant, and all of the Settlement Class Members will be in the same position as they were prior to the execution of the Settlement Agreement, and the Settlement will have no legal effect, no class will remain certified (conditionally or otherwise), and the Plaintiff and Defendant will continue to litigate the lawsuit. If the Settlement is not approved, there can be no assurance that the Settlement Class will recover more than is provided in the Settlement Agreement, or indeed, anything at all.
Back To Top
The Court has approved the following attorneys to represent the Settlement Class. They are called “Class Counsel.” You will not be charged for these lawyers because they are being paid out of the Settlement Fund. If you want to be represented by your own lawyer instead, you may hire one at your own expense.
Ryan F. Stephan
James B. Zouras
Andrew C. Ficzko
Stephan Zouras, LLC
222 W. Adams Street, Suite 2020
Chicago, IL 60606
312.233.1550 / 312.233.1560 fax
rstephan@stephanzouras.com
jzouras@stephanzouras.com
aficzko@stephanzouras.com
Back To Top
The Notice is only a summary of the proposed settlement of this lawsuit. More details are in the Settlement Agreement that, along with other documents, is available here, or can be obtained by contacting Class Counsel (contact information noted above) or contact the Settlement Administrator (contact information noted below). All pleadings and documents filed in court may be reviewed or copied in the Office of the Clerk.
Please do not call the Judge or the Clerk of the Court about this case. They will not be able to give you advice on your options.
Nosal v. Rich Products Corporation c/o Settlement Administrator
P.O. Box 25226 Santa Ana, CA 92799
Toll Free: (833) 514-2793
Back To Top